Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership!

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: Which is the highest
Posted by Anonymous
1/16/2007  7:22:00 AM
"Heres a good one. In between the Waltz and the Foxtrot. Which if any is higher than the other at its highest point. Look before you leap. remember the description from the technique book. Which is commence to rise at the end of step one.. Continue to rise on two and three. Foxtrot. Rise at the end of one. Up on two and three. If the last sentence is analized the highest point is imediently after one on two, no further rise."

WRONG.

In reality the highest point in foxtrot is at the formal end of step two, which is to say when the feet pass to begin step three.

Don't take my word for it, open your eyes and LOOK.

And you will soon realize it would not work any other way.

The textbook does not mention this, because it is concerned with the RISING ACTION, not with the ALTITUDE of the body which includes additional factors.
Re: Which is the highest
Posted by quickstep
1/16/2007  3:05:00 PM
I think you will find that you still have your heel on the floor after step one. Which is not according to the correct technique. You might also look at steps four and five on a Reverse Turn. Do it according to the book and what do you have. Are you on two toes with your weight equally divided at that point. Is that what the book says or not.
Re: Which is the highest
Posted by Anonymous
1/16/2007  3:05:00 PM
"I think you will find that you still have your heel on the floor after step one. Which is not according to the correct technique."

Dancing as lady I would indeed, as is required.

Dancing as man I would not, as is required.

But those are both entirely beside the point.

Try putting down the book and watching some excellent dancers. Or try reading Scrivener, who was ready to call a spade a spade and point out the simple fact that the heighest altitude is achieved at the end of step 2/beginning of step 3 - NOT the end of step 1 as an oversimplified reading of Moore leads you to mistakenly conclude.
Re: Which is the highest
Posted by latindiva
1/17/2007  1:37:00 AM
the highest point is in the waltz, because in the foxtrot you are doing a rise but they tell you with "no foot rise", as you don't rise your feet like you do in the waltz, and in foxtrot you don't make a maximum rise like the waltz. So i guess this doesn't need to complicate things no?
Re: Which is the highest
Posted by Anonymous
1/17/2007  6:53:00 AM
Yes, waltz is higher than foxtrot.

However, all of waltz, foxtrot, and quickstep reach their own highest height at about the same point, as a result of the body arriving or passing directly over a nearly straight leg. This is simple and automatic geometry, which the Moore/ISTD books do not concern themselves with - instead, they speak of the rising action, which is indeed over after step one for foxtrot.

(Of course a nearly straight leg does not mean absolutely straight - the knee must still be soft and not be locked.).
Re: Which is the highest
Posted by quickstep
1/17/2007  3:24:00 PM
So the height is the same in the four swing dances . The only difference is the way we get there. I think you will find except for the stretch in the body there is no appreciable difference in the height that the heel is off he floor.
Re: Which is the highest
Posted by Anonymous
1/17/2007  3:55:00 PM
"So the height is the same in the four swing dances ."

Abosolutely NOT!

Foxtrot is much lower than waltz!

"The only difference is the way we get there."

That is also different.

"I think you will find except for the stretch in the body there is no appreciable difference in the height that the heel is off he floor."

If you allow yourself to get ahead of the music in foxtrot, you may have to rise to a waltz like altitude to control yourself, but if you dance it PROPERLY as demonstrated by the masters, your maximum rise will be moderate.

Contrast in waltz, you will at times be over a fairly straight leg with a lot of foot rise. Wheras in foxtrot, your heel would only be moderately off the floor while your are directly over it. It is very high off the floor only at times when the body is not over it, in other words when the height of the heel does not contribute to the altitude of the body.

Characteristic waltz figures require dramatic rise which absorbs almost all of the motion energy in order to work. Characteristic foxtrot figures on the other hand would be ENTIRELY RUINED if danced risen to waltz height. Not to mention, the lady's footwork would be impossible if her parnter was rising to a waltz-like altitude!
Re: Which is the highest
Posted by quickstep
1/17/2007  4:08:00 PM
I'm looking at Hilton and partners feet in Waltz and Foxtrot. You know who they are. What do I see.
It is a very beginnerish mistake to think that in passing steps there is any diference in the height of the heel from the floor. Discusion finished.
Re: Which is the highest
Posted by Anonymous
1/17/2007  5:19:00 PM
"I'm looking at Hilton and partners feet in Waltz and Foxtrot. You know who they are. What do I see.
It is a very beginnerish mistake to think that in passing steps there is any diference in the height of the heel from the floor. Discusion finished."

If you mean that a foxtrot figure imported into waltz is not that different than when it is danced in foxtrot, I would agree.

But if you compare *characteristic* foxtrot figures to *characteristic* waltz figures, the altitude of the rise is VERY DIFFERENT.
Re: Which is the highest
Posted by Xtal
1/20/2007  4:30:00 PM
As I understand it, and perhaps I am wrong, but the footwork for both dances as a man is the same, heel toe, toe, toe heel. However, I was taught that in order to keep the characteristics of the dance, foxtrot has a lower rise and waltz higher. My understanding is that the rise in waltz is to help not only with the patterns but also to reflect true waltz music. The way that I was taught to keep foxtrot rise lower is by pitching the knee forward so that you have the same amount of foot rise but as you would in the waltz but not the same amount of overall rise.

To my understanding, this is done because in foxtrot your overall goal is to have equal step size for your slows and quicks. In order to show a difference between the two dances (besides just timing)you have to apply the proper styling and characteristics as well (which includes rise and sway).

I was also taught that the reason this works is because your lines are mostly created from the leg you are leaving behind, and are created mostly on your first and third steps, therefore the pitching of the knee shouldn't affect any leg lines that are being created.

Now, I would like to conclude this by saying I've only been dancing (instructing) for a year, so if someone is POSITIVE that this is wrong, I would love to know.. however if you are just making and educated guess as I am (from manuals, videos, etc.), then I would love to hear your position on it, but please don't claim it as fact. Thanks!

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2024 BallroomDancers.com