Log In



   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status




Recover Password

Username or Email:

Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership!


Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,400 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!


Sponsored Ad
Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by molesaver
1/11/2008  3:43:00 PM
Question from a beginning lead.

The steps going into a quarter turn and a grapevine are very similar - slow, slow to outside partner, then you can continue with either the quarter turn or the grapevine but what is the clear, unmistakeable lead cue to either step? My partner is having trouble reading my mind so I'm looking for a more reliable method. Thanks.
Re: Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by dheun
1/11/2008  7:45:00 PM
That's a great question, and I also look forward to hearing from the instructors and experienced dancers in how they answer this.
I also have some trouble in making sure my partner knows when we are going to any steps that unfold outside partner, which is where most of the interesting, fun and classy steps take place in my opinion.
I would love to know some fail-safe triggers, other than whispering "Grapevine," or "Continuity Styling" or "Shadow Twinkles" when we are moving into more advanced steps. The Fox Trot seems to pose the most trouble in this regard, whereas in a dance like the Rumba, it seems the transition to more advanced steps fit right into place. Is that it? That the Fox Trot moves in LOD, whereas Rumba is more stationary?
Thanks for the question, molesaver.
Re: Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by terence2
1/11/2008  11:40:00 PM
They are not remotely similar IF you commence it from a Silver twinkle .
Re: Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by Waltz123
1/13/2008  10:26:00 AM
They are not remotely similar IF you commence it from a Silver twinkle.
Right, but he's not starting from a Twinkle (which produces a totally different kind of Grapevine anyway). He wants to start from O.P. position.

It's always easy enough when presented with a problem to say, "Just do something else". But that doesn't do anything to solve the underlying problem. He wants to improve his ability to lead, which is commendable. So we should help him explore the problem using the context he's presented.

See my other message for my solutions, and feel free to add your own!

Re: Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by terence2
1/13/2008  10:36:00 AM
I was responding to the Open tele. comment-- am well aware of his predicament.--
And Jonathon-- his underlying problem is the very step he is trying to commence from.

The grapevine is a silver movement-- and that is its recommended starting point. Why not suggest a more practical position ?-- to me as a coach-- I look for simple solutions, Yes-- i can make pretty much anything work, within reason-- to me -- simplicity is the key to all good movement .
Re: Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by Waltz123
1/13/2008  8:42:00 PM
Actually the Grapevine is both a Bronze and a Silver element. Arthur Murray, Fred Astaire and our own syllabus all have a bronze version. The Grapevine used in all three syllabi is taken tandem/parallel and to the man's left, typically in a closed hold but not in contact. The two chains' version is entered exactly as Molesaver described above; Ours has the forward walk as one possible entry, but not the preferred one (and only due to phrasing considerations). The point is, it's common and danced all over America as a simple and standard figure by Bronze level social dancers. And that particular entry is nearly as common.

That being the case, it's not necessarily the simplest solution to say, "Avoid this common and very simple entry that everyone around you is doing. Instead, save yourself the trouble and learn this high difficulty technical pattern." That's jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire. No matter whose fault it is, if he's having trouble leading his partner into a simple Grapevine, it's guaranteed that his problems will multiply tenfold if he attempts to throw in a Silver Twinkle to boot.

Not only is a Silver Twinkle in and of itself difficult to execute well, but there's no guarantee he and his partner will find it any easier to lead & follow the Grapevine. If they're having trouble distinguishing between a closed position box and a tandem Grapevine, then there's no reason they won't have the same trouble leading & following the difference between a box or Feather ending from PP and a Grapevine from PP. In fact, chances are they'll have more trouble with the position changes.

Even if one enters the Grapevine with an easier pattern, say a Bronze Twinkle (questionable, but I'll roll with it for the sake of argument), or even a promenade walk, it's still not a given that it's better to use it in favor of the more common Bronze entry. Throughout our dance careers, we are constantly presented with the choice of whether to buckle down and work on something difficult, or ditch it in favor of something easier. Certainly there are times when the latter is preferable. But I would rarely make that choice when it comes to very fundamental movements or technique. Imagine having difficulty taking a basic heel step, and rather than spending the time refining that technique, you simply avoid all patterns involving a heel lead. You wouldn't be left with much. Of course, this is a silly example, but it illustrates the point that the more fundamental the technique, the more important it is to work through the problem rather than around it.

The skills necessary to lead the difference between a closed box and a Grapevine (or any passing action, for that matter) are very rudimentary. Perhaps not as much as a heel lead, but not far from. And certainly they are fundamental enough that one should not be avoiding them. The Grapevine is the perfect step to introduce such concepts, as they will constantly resurface as one moves through the levels with more complicated patterns. What better a time to attack it than with a simple pattern that doesn't require the highly developed technical skills of Silver level dancing.

Luckily, because the two patterns giving him trouble are relatively simple, the solution itself is equally simple... enough so that I think he will probably discover the answer himself with just a little encouragement and exploration on his own. This is why I didn't just give away the answer immediately. But whether he figures it out on his own or not, once he has the information, I suspect it won't take much effort for him to achieve success without having to completely avoid the pattern or the entry.

Re: Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by terence2
1/14/2008  7:34:00 AM
That Jonathon, is your opinion ( silver twinkle being more difficult )

And this is not about deflecting technique thru other means .

My reason for introducing it an early level is primarily a " taster " for silver.

I,m of the personal opinion that the silver approach gives more flow to the figure, and I teach this in all my Br. social classes . (silv. twk. )Never had much of a problem, if any .

I will also disagree with the current assessment of the construction to achieve the desired result , bad entries are bad entries-- no matter what the standard and or division.

I coached ( and Examined ) at A/m for multi yrs, and always showed the silv. twinkle method to Br. students ( with great success, I might add ).

Also, in many of the comps i have judged at br. level, that entry appears to have met with good reception.( Guess I,m not the only one introducing it )

Re: Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by Anonymous
1/12/2008  10:43:00 AM
Grapevine: is 4 QQQQ. Timing makes the difference.
Re: Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by terence2
1/13/2008  1:10:00 AM
NOT necessarily so-- it can be adapted to other sequential rhythms-- it is a MOVEMENT , and as such is defined by appearance as much as rhythm ( its also done in other dances and called a Zig Zag )
Re: Am. Foxtrot Q-turn vs. Grapevine
Posted by Waltz123
1/13/2008  10:12:00 AM
There's no "cue" per se. Like most closed position movements, the way you move your body from one foot to the next is the lead. A missed lead is not the result of some cue you didn't provide but rather a breakdown in one or both of your ability to communicate through movement.

For example, the dance position could be too disconnected (either in terms of tone, weight connection, or actual physical contact) to be able to effectively transmit the information. Or she could simply not be experienced enough to gauge the subtle differences -- Either not sensitive enough, or too presumptive. In other words, not truly following. Or your movement may be ambiguous, too subtle to indicate a difference between the two.

The third problem is the easiest for you as a leader to fix. And to a limited extent, it can be exaggerated in social dancing to overcompensate for the other two (though I wouldn't make a habit of it). So as with any two similar feeling movements, your job is to define the difference between the two, and then focus on improving your ability to clarify such through the movement of your own body.

So let's start there: You tell me what you think the differences are between the two, and in particular at what point they begin to depart, and if you haven't answered the question yourself already, I'll fill in the blanks.

Jonathan Atkinson

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2018 BallroomDancers.com