English
Hello, guest.

Log In or
Register
Return to Forum
Kyle and Susan Webb--Rumba and Cha Cha timing
Posted by Danceagainsam
7/9/2002  10:14:00 AM
This instructor teaches Rumba to start with slow and then quick-quick, ie, Slow-quick-quick.

I have previously learned that one should start from the sides as quick-quick-Slow. This instructor teaches the Rumba as 3-and-4-1-2 it would appear, when compared with what I know before. The downbeat is slow according to Kyle. I have learned that the down beat is the first quick.

The flavor is a little different.


For Cha Cha, I was once taught that it should be 2-3-4-and-1, with the third Cha at one of the two downbeats. But kyle seems to have it simplified as 1-2-3and4, with 3and 4 as the Cha-Cha-Cha.

Is this simplification correct now? No first lead in step for the first measure is needed according to Kyle, it would appear.
re: Kyle and Susan Webb--Rumba and Cha Cha timing
Posted by Jonathan Atkinson
7/9/2002  12:41:00 PM
SQQ timing is taught by the Arthur Murray studios, while QQS is taught by Fred Astaire studios. The rhythm you learn will depend on which studio chain your teacher is a descendant of (directly or indirectly). Each of the two groups swears that theirs is the "correct" timing for Rumba.

Having taught for an Arthur Murrays for 5 years and then an ex-Fred Astaire studio for 5 years after that, I've had approximately equal exposure to both versions of Rumba timing. What I found was that I ended up liking the QQS version better in terms of the way the movements break down, and especially to commence the dance with a chasse. But purely from a timing standpoint, I don't see much sense in QQS. The bass, which is the backbone of the music, plays SQQ timing. So to dance QQS in my opinion is to go against the music.

The problem is, once you get accustomed to one or the other timing, it will start to sound correct to you, whether or not the music truly warrants it. This is why a Fred Astaire dancer will hear a Rumba as QQS, but will hear a Bolero as SQQ, even though the music can be similar in all respects except tempo. The orchestration can be different; A Rumba can be more rhythmical and a Bolero more lyrical, but none of these facts should offset the timing by two beats. This is why, after 5 years of each, I decided to go back to the original SQQ timing.

As for your Cha Cha timing, the ballroom dance world tends to be more unified: They like 2,3,4&1. There is a segment of the social dance population which prefers 1,2,3&4. What's interesting here is that the timing will tend to have an effect on the way you interpret the movement. Taking the rock step directly on the downbeat will have a more social (or even a cowboy cha cha) look, while taking the third cha on the downbeat will look and feel decidedly more ballroom (Latin ballroom, that is).

The timing of the music itself is slightly more flexible than Rumba. Cha Cha has a fairly straight and steady downbeat feel, with each of the 4 beats having roughly equal accent (apart from the implied strength of beat 1). Often there will be rhythms filling in between the beats, too (the "and" counts). Some songs may have a stronger accent on certain upbeats, while some do not. In traditional Afro Cuban-style Cha Chas, the Conga (and sometimes cowbell) plays a very noticeable "4&1" rhythm, which is why we try to match our "Cha Cha Cha" to beats 4&1 (and, as a result, the rock ends up on 2,3). But in other variations of Cha Cha music, an argument can definitely be made for placing the Cha Cha syncopated chasse somewhere else. There is a certain version of Tea for Two which has a strong 1,2,3&4 rhythm. Dance 2,3,4&1 ballroom timing to this tune, and you'll look like you're either deaf, or listening to a walkman.

Anyway, the moral of the story is that it's good to be flexible, especially where social dancing is concerned. If you dance with a partner who can't keep his or her rock step off of the 1 beat, then go with them. Social dancing is all about adaptating to conditions. That includes adapting to the styles of different partners, (different teachers in your case), and different types of music. Now that you know you can dance Rumba SQQ or QQS, you have more flexibility -- and that's a good thing!

On the other hand, if you ever dance for a ballroom exam or competition, make sure you have the correct timing down, even if the music is begging you to do otherise. Judges and examiners have a very fixed idea of what is correct in terms of timing: 2,3,4&1 for Cha Cha, SQQ for Rumba at Arthur Murrays, and QQS for Rumba at Fred Astaires.

Regards,
Jonathan Atkinson
re: Kyle and Susan Webb--Rumba and Cha Cha timing
Posted by Dronak
7/10/2002  10:09:00 AM
As usual, Jonathan has given a very good reply. For American style rumba, I'd say either SQQ or QQS is fine depending on what the music sounds like. I was taught one way (I forget because it was a while ago and I really only dance international now), but sometimes the music sounded one way to me and sometimes the other. I'd pick which ever rhythm seemed to fit the music better to me. As for cha cha, the standard is 2 3 4&1. Almost all ballroom cha cha songs are going to have a clear cha-cha-cha on the 4&1 count so the steps should match that music. I suppose you could dance it as 1 2 3&4 anyway, but since it doesn't match the music it probably wouldn't look right. I think Jonathan is right though, some songs don't put the cha-cha-cha on 4&1 in which case you should adjust your timing so that you match the music. I think Jonathan's example of Tea For Two is a good one; I had to think about it, but I do think he's right that at least some version puts the cha cha steps on 3&4 for that song. In that case, dancing the standard 2 3 4&1 wouldn't look right. I think the easy way to do it is listen for the cha cha cha in the music and then dance to match that, don't worry about whether you're breaking on 2 or 1 or whatever. Match the cha cha cha and you should be fine.

--
James Marshall
marshall@astro.umd.edu
http://www.astro.umd.edu/~marshall

re: Kyle and Susan Webb--Rumba and Cha Cha timing
Posted by Blair
7/9/2002  11:16:00 AM
While the QQS timing is sometimes used, SQQ is the most common timing used for American Rumba. I have attached a link to the rumba description on this site.
http://www.ballroomdancers.com/Dances/dance_overview.asp?Dance=ARU

However, the standard timing for cha-cha is 234&1 or written another way 1234&. I have never heard of anyone dancing to the timing you mentioned (123&4) and I don't think it would fit the music very well.
http://www.ballroomdancers.com/Dances/dance_overview.asp?Dance=ACC

Blair
re: Kyle and Susan Webb--Rumba and Cha Cha timing
Posted by Danceagainsam
7/10/2002  9:37:00 AM
Thank you so much for an imformative answer.


I think I like SQQ for the Rumba better. This is more intuitive to me.


2-3-4&1 for Cha Cha does need some practice. I can see why 1-2-3&4 has its followers; this is also more intuitive.
Re: re: Kyle and Susan Webb--Rumba and Cha Cha tim
Posted by nloftofan1
3/14/2013  9:06:00 AM
Some very good answers have been posted. As for Rumba, in some cases (more common in newer Rumba music) the rhythm is naturally SQQ, while in other cases it is QQS. As for the dance figures, you were probably taught them using one of the two conventions. I was taught by instructors who followed the QQS convention. I have a syllabus I purchased used from an instructor that (the syllabus) uses the SQQ convention. The instructor marked it up so that he could teach the patterns with the QQS rhythm. It's just a matter of where you start. If you listen to the music you can hear the S and you can hear the QQ. Jump in on whichever beat coincides with how you learned the figures. Once you are dancing it doesn't matter.

As for Cha-Cha, one instructor I know is very insistent (almost pedantic) in insisting that "it's Cha-Cha, NOT Cha-Cha_Cha." She breaks down the figures using the 1-2-3-4& rhythm. That is, she matches one measure of dance steps to one measure of music. If (for example) you are dancing the basic movement, it's customary to start with a side step on the 1 beat. In her approach, that's step 1. Her step 1 is on beat 1 of the music. Next comes a rock step (2-3) followed by a chasse (or side-close; I may be using the term "chasse" incorrectly) on the 4&. That finishes the measure. The next step, a side step, starts the next measure, and it also starts the rhythm again. Simple and logical, and it fits the music. In the other (Cha-Cha-Cha) approach the first side step (1) is a "prep step." Then you dance 2-3-4&-1 (or 2, 3, cha-cha-cha). That means that the basic rhythm straddles two measures: it starts on beat 2 (the up beat) and the final step is on the first beat of the next measure. A little more complicated to analyze.

It comes down to the difference between rhythm and timing. Rhythm is the pattern of slows and quicks (or quicks and ands), while timing refers to which beat you start the rhythm with. In one case (one version of the rhythm) you start (timing) on beat 1. In the other case (the other version of the rhythm) you start (timing) on beat 2. Once again, it doesn't really matter once you are dancing. Do whatever works for you.
Re: re: Kyle and Susan Webb--Rumba and Cha Cha tim
Posted by chrisnabavi
3/14/2013  4:49:00 AM
I'm a social dancer and have read this discussion with interest.

Most music that is suitable for dancing the cha cha either has the forth beat split into two half beats, i.e. 1-2-3-4& (traditional cha cha music) or it has both the first and third beats split, i.e. 1&2-3&4 (many popular tunes). In the first case, dancing 2-3-4&1 fits and a lead in step on 1 at the start of the dance is needed. In the second case, by ignoring the split on the first beat, we get 1-2-3&4, so no lead in step is needed. There are very few tunes that are intrinsically 1-2-3&4.

I've listened to a dozen versions of Tea for Two and most of them seem to have the second rhythm, namely 1&2-3&4. So I would dance the cha cha to those starting the chassis on beat 1 without a lead in step.

As for the rhumba, both of my teachers use the QQS rhythm on 2-3-4-1 (with the slow on starting on 4 and a hip movement on 1). But they disagree on the lead in step. One advocates a lead in step on 1, which is what I've always done, but the other teacher "allows" that for beginners but says that in the rhumba one never steps on 1 and he suggests doing a lead in step on 4, with a hip movement on 1. That to me seems to defeat the whole purpose of the lead in step, which I've always thought was to satisfy the natural desire to always start a dance on 1. If one is not supposed to step on 1 in the rhumba, then one might as well forget the lead in step all together and start on 2, ideally with a hip movement on 1, rather than starting with a lead in step on 4.
Re: re: Kyle and Susan Webb--Rumba and Cha Cha tim
Posted by Anna
3/24/2013  2:36:00 PM
If we placed a peice of paper under each foot at the toe. How many of us could do even a simple basic and still retain the peice of paper under each foot. This is for males as well as females. Men. Perform the ladies going around part of the Rope Spin and see how good you are. Whoops one step and its lost already.
Copyright © 1997-2014 BallroomDancers.com