"Well, all I can say is that neither of those problems occur in my pro's teaching. I don't know on what basis you generalize your statement to all or most pros who teach pro-am students."
The statement was not a generally one, but was offered to refute your unfounded claim that dancing with a pro is somehow protection against developing bad habits. Dancing with a pro for exam purposes would be one thing - but toss in competition pressure (in a division where appearence is everything and technique often lax) and the pragmatic result may deviate far from focus on proper habits.
"Nor does being an amateur couple preclude the lady from pressing her hips against her partner or creating shape incorrectly. Why would it?"
The simple reason is that professional men have a reserve of strenght and ability to draw on in compensating for a student's bad habits, which few amateur men share. A pro-am partnership is not an equal one, but usually one optomized to make the most short term use of the stronger partner. Unless the student is not attempting competition but focused on improving her dancing as its own goal - that is the time when the alleged advantages of pro-am may be real.
"After all, except for the very top coaches who only coach couples (my pro and I take periodic coaching from such a person), it's usually the same pros coaching the am couple that also teach pro-ams."
Sit and watch for a few hours and you'll see how the two types of couples are getting very different coaching from the same teacher. The demands of competition are different, the assets the couples bring are different, and as a result the type of dancing that results is different. BTW, it's not uncommon to see amateur couples trying to dance with pro-am styling - usually they are trained in isolation from established amateur programs, and do not go far once they meet real competition.