Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by phil.samways
2/5/2007  2:49:00 AM
Anonymous
There is no need to be so rude. I was not mis-quoting you. Here's exactly what you wrote on 2 feb (i've cut and paste it, so there'd be no mis-quoting). You were responding to a comment by quickstep:

"""""""

"{This is quickstep's comment}In the Foxtrot Waltz we keep the foot, which is behind, in contact with the floor and keep it in contact with the floor through to under the body. The toe becomes a ball and then a heel as we continue . If the next step were a toe the ball of the foot will become a toe still on the floor. Go and have a look."

{This is your response}You do that when you walk too, you just don't notice it because a) you don't think about it and b) the steps are smaller and so the development of their details is less important and c) you get so distracted by this red herring of picking up the feet that you fail to notice how everything else is the same

"""""""

Go back and check.
You 'corrected' me by quoting something completely different, which i wasn't referring to.

Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by Anonymous
2/5/2007  6:23:00 AM
Phil,

You not only MISQUOTE, you then LIE about it.

You said that I claimed the two were the same, and then tried to point out that I was wrong because the feet are picked up.

But in fact, as you now seem to have figured out, I did not say that they were the same - I said that they were the same except for the "RED HERRING OF PICKING UP THE FEET"
Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by Finished Feather
3/28/2007  4:57:00 PM
Wow! It's hard to imagine you guys enjoy your dancing! This thread is enough to make your head spin! All because of a reference to walking? I could have spent 3 hours in the studio for all the time spent bickering over feet! Hope you all work it out on the dance floor anyway! (Seriously)
Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by Anonymous
3/28/2007  5:32:00 PM
"Wow! It's hard to imagine you guys enjoy your dancing! This thread is enough to make your head spin! All because of a reference to walking? I could have spent 3 hours in the studio for all the time spent bickering over feet! Hope you all work it out on the dance floor anyway! (Seriously)"

Actually, I'm having a great time dancing, with very little time off from practice and lessons (with some really outstanding teachers you have certainly heard of) for much else. But as quickstep's mistakes are so eternally repetitive, and I type rather fast, preventing him from infecting others with his nonsense doesn't take more than a few minutes out of my day.
Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by Anonymous
3/28/2007  9:38:00 PM
Do you believe the correct footwork and the correct use of the feet is important in any of the dances. If your answer is no you are a walk about foot lifting sub standard social dancer who would be happiest dancing in a ploughed field wearing gumboots.
Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by Anonymous
3/28/2007  9:48:00 PM
"Do you believe the correct footwork and the correct use of the feet is important in any of the dances. If your answer is no you are a walk about foot lifting sub standard social dancer who would be happiest dancing in a ploughed field wearing gumboots."

I believe that the correct action of the STANDING FOOT is absolutely critical.

On the other hand, the action of the moving foot is of relatively little importance. Yes, you want it to be efficient with no wasted extra actions such as an unecessary lift. And more importantly, you want to be sure that no action of the moving foot disturbs your body.

But you will not really understand the mechanics of dancing, until you can MENTALLY ERASE THE IRRELEVENT PARTS OF THE PICTURE and examine only those relevent to the problem at hand. For example, if you want to understand how the body moves, ERASE THE MOVING LEG FROM THE PICTURE. Only be concentrating you attention on the STANDING LEG will you ever start to see what is really critical to the mechanics of the dance.

Once you understand the core mechanism, then you can put the side details back in. But until then they will only confuse you... as your lenghty posting history, regardless if you feel like writing as quicktep or as redriding, only serves to demonstrate.
Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by Quickstep
3/29/2007  3:16:00 AM
You are still steering away from the contact with the floor of the leg that is moving. Everybody in Australia who watched this weeks Dancing with the Stars know what happens when the moving foot is not in contact with the floor because they have listened to the advice and criticism given by the judges. One of whome is a Blackpool judge and a former World finalist.
What is the first thing that goes if the moving foot is not in contact with the floor?. Exciting isn' t it.
Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by Anonymous
3/29/2007  6:35:00 AM
"You are still steering away from the contact with the floor of the leg that is moving."

No, in fact I am not.

But you are still OBSESSING ABOUT A SUBJECT OF LITTLE IMPORTANCE, in a way that is blinding you to the subject or REAL IMPORTANCE:

The action of the standing leg
Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by Finished Feather
3/29/2007  11:25:00 AM
Nice! I absolutely believe correct footwork is important...so does that make me a run about foot placing super standard competetive dancer best suited for Blackpool? Yippee! You must be a very insecure person, whoever you are.
Re: Dancing and Walking
Posted by Anonymous
3/29/2007  2:39:00 PM
"Nice! I absolutely believe correct footwork is important...so does that make me a run about foot placing super standard competetive dancer best suited for Blackpool? Yippee! You must be a very insecure person, whoever you are."

Unfortuntely, if you jump into a thread part way through, you often don't get the context of the message you are responding to.

I didn't say footwork was unimportant - in fact I said the exact opposite. I said the the action of the standing foot was extremely important.

I then went on to criticize quickstep for obsessing about the comparatively unimportant altitude of the moving foot (on the floor or not) to such a distracting degree that he or she is overlooking key details in the action of the standing foot and the body relative to it.

In fact, if you get the body moving correctly relative to the standing foot, and the standing foot using the correct action, you would be extremely unlikely to pick up the moving foot unless you intentinoally wanted to! (And the reason for wanting to would be wearing something other than dance shoes, or moving across something other than a wood floor).

While not optimal dance technique for ideal sistuations, when picking up the moving foot is necessitated by a poor shoe or surface, you should be able to do so without distorting the rest of your technique...

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2026 BallroomDancers.com