Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership!

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: That advice is OK for classes.
Posted by pakarinen
8/20/2010  1:02:00 PM
Before beginning private lessons, though, you really should have a partner


I disagree. I know many dancers from beginners to pro-am competitors who do not have a regular partner. Of course, they compete or dance showcases, etc with their teachers only. I think the partner vs single issue is a matter of personal preference, availability, and partly one of disposable $$$.

For the record, I do have a regular partner with whom I take private lessons but I've also taken privates alone. We started partnering to save money on lessons (split the cost) and evolved from there.
Thanks.
Posted by jofjonesboro
8/20/2010  1:20:00 PM
When you took private lessons without an amateur partner, with whom did you practice?

jj
Re: Thanks.
Posted by pakarinen
8/22/2010  6:01:00 AM
When you took private lessons without an amateur partner, with whom did you practice?


Depends on the definition of practice. I danced / practiced at home by myself. I also danced with different follows at studio socials. And I danced with my instructor at the time.
Definition of practice?
Posted by jofjonesboro
8/22/2010  11:41:00 AM
We may all not agree on much but I think I'm pretty safe in defining practice as repetition for the sake of mastery.

I'm well aware that many folks start taking private lessons without a partner. I did so myself and learned the value of a partner the hard way.

The primary value of having a partner is developmental. Being able to practice as much as necessary means that your growth as a dancer will be faster and more thorough.

What bothers me about your original post is that you may discourage Chester-Smith from seeking a partner simply because you didn't do so.

When visitors to this site request advice, we should help them find what's best for them and not try to validate our own decisions by leading others to make the same ones.

jj
Re: Definition of practice?
Posted by Lycaean69
8/30/2010  11:53:00 AM
Absolutely, I agree with JJ!
Undoubtedly, dancing just like any other sports needs practice, and lots of it to make your dance steps and body movements perfect! And one can only achieve that goal with a regular partner who shares the same passion!
Re: New to Ballroom Dancing
Posted by pakarinen
8/12/2010  6:54:00 AM
One thing that I think is very important is to follow some kind of written syllabus. I spent a couple years at a studio where the classes were taught seemingly at random, based on the perceived skill levels of the attendees.

I did learn a lot of Bronze level figures but I also spent a lot of money on what were effectively review sessions. And I was never 100% certain at which level I was dancing.

You might not be a "linear" learner but I still think it's good to have mileposts to check off as your skill level advances.

This is not meant as an ad, but DVIDA offers figure sheets that you could use to track your progress.

Copyright  ©  1997-2025 BallroomDancers.com